Join PER® September 15th for the New York Advanced Practice Collaborative Meeting! Directed toward NP/PAs, this meeting blends presentations on cutting-edge information with panel discussions to enhance learning.

Outpatient Electronic Prescriptions

Monday, February 13, 2012
In order to determine the error rate of outpatient electronic prescriptions, a group of researchers in the Boston, MA, area retrospectively reviewed 3,850 computer-generated prescriptions received by a commercial outpatient pharmacy chain from three states (Arizona, Florida, and Massachusetts) over a 4-week period in 2008. A panel of clinicians reviewed the prescriptions to identify and classify any errors.

Of these prescriptions, 452 (11.7%) contained a total of 466 errors and 163 (35.0%) of these errors were classified as potential adverse drug events (ADEs). Of the potential ADEs, 95 (58.3%) were classified as significant and 68 (41.7%) were classified as serious. However, none were life-threatening. The most common drug classes associated with the prescription errors were antimicrobials (40.3%), nervous-system drugs (13.9%), and respiratory-system drugs (8.6%). The most common drug classes associated with potential ADEs were nervous-system drugs (27.0%), cardiovascular drugs (13.5%), and antimicrobials (12.3%). About 60% of the potential errors were related to missing or omitted information. The researchers noted that error frequency with electronic prescriptions was consistent with outpatient handwritten and electronic prescription error rates reported in the literature.

The researchers identified interventions to reduce the error rate of outpatient electronic prescriptions, which include forcing functions, specific drug decision-support systems such as maximum dose checkers, and integration of calculators. Forcing functions, for example, can be used to prevent omitted information, such as incomplete drug names, medications that need patient instructions, and inappropriate abbreviations. The researchers noted that forcing functions could have eliminated 71.7% of total errors and 63.2% of potential ADEs.


Nanji KC, Rothchild JM, Salzberg C, et al. Errors associated with outpatient computerized prescribing systems. J Am Med Infom Assoc. 2011; 18:767-773.

Talk about this article with nurses and others in the oncology community in the General Discussions Oncology Nursing News discussion group.
Lisa Schulmeister, MN, RN, ACNS-BC, FAAN
Blog Info
Lisa Schulmeister, MN, RN, ACNS-BC, FAAN is an oncology nursing consultant and editor-in-chief of Oncology Nursing News.
Author Bio
Lisa Schulmeister, MN, RN, ACNS-BC, FAAN, is the Editor-in-Chief for OncLive Nursing. She is an oncology nursing consultant and adjunct assistant professor of nursing at Louisiana State Health Sciences Center in New Orleans, LA. She provides continuing nursing education to nurses across the Unites States, is active in several professional nursing organizations, and is intrigued by the many ways nurses use technology to communicate.
External Resources

MJH Associates
American Journal of Managed Care
MD Magazine
Pharmacy Times
Physicians' Education Resource
Specialty Pharmacy Times
OncNurse Resources

Continuing Education
Web Exclusives

About Us
Advisory Board
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Intellisphere, LLC
2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
P: 609-716-7777
F: 609-716-4747

Copyright OncNursing 2006-2018
Intellisphere, LLC. All Rights Reserved.