Latest NewsFDA NewsAdverse Event ManagementSupportive CareDisparities in Cancer CareDrug SafetyRadiation OncologySurvivorship Practice ManagementPreventionContributorsSponsored
Expert ConnectionsMorning RoundsThe VitalsPodcastsVideosBetween the LinesFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsTraining Academy
Conference CoverageConference Listing
Publications
Continuing Education
Case-Based Digest Rx Road MapWebinarsCancer Summary SlidesMPN Symptom ManagementEvents
SubscribePartners
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancerGenitourinary CancerGenitourinary CancerGenitourinary Cancer
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head and Neck Cancers
HematologyHematologyHematologyHematologyHematologyHematology
Lung Cancer
Pediatric Cancer
Sarcomas
Skin CancerSkin Cancer
Advanced Practice Corner Logo
    Brain Cancer
    Breast CancerBreast Cancer
    Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
    Genitourinary CancerGenitourinary CancerGenitourinary CancerGenitourinary Cancer
    Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
    Head and Neck Cancers
    HematologyHematologyHematologyHematologyHematologyHematology
    Lung Cancer
    Pediatric Cancer
    Sarcomas
    Skin CancerSkin Cancer
    Advanced Practice Corner Logo
        • Publications
        • Subscribe
        • Partners
      Advertisement

      5-Year Follow-Up Confirms Health-Related QOL Benefit With Nivolumab/Ipilimumab in Advanced RCC

      February 25, 2022
      By Lindsay Fischer
      Article

      The immunotherapy combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab elicited favorable health-related quality of life responses compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

      Nivolumab (Opdivo) plus ipilimumab (Yervoy) was associated with better maintained health-related quality of life (HRQOL) compared with sunitinib (Sutent) across multiple sub-groups of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), according to a 5-year follow-up analysis of the CheckMate 214 trial (NCT02231749), which was presented during the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.1

      Furthermore, the benefit was observed across multiple definitions and subgroup population analyses, suggesting that the combination is linked with favorable long-term health-related QOL (HRQOL) outcomes. The data were presented during the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

      When compared with sunitinib, nivolumab/ipilimumab was associated with least square (LS) mean longitudinal changes from baseline, a longer time to confirmed deterioration, and less bothersome adverse events (AEs). These findings were consistent across both the all-randomized and intermediate-/poor-risk populations.

      “Nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate HRQOL benefits with extended follow-up vs sunitinib, with significant differences in scale scores between the treatment arms favoring nivolumab plus ipilimumab,” lead author David Cella, FASCO, PhD, of Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, and coinvestigators, wrote in a poster presentation of the findings.

      The FDA approved nivolumab plus ipilimumab in April 2018 as a frontline treatment for intermediate- and poor-risk patients with RCC, based on earlier findings from the phase 3 CheckMate-214 trial.

      CheckMate-214 enrolled 1096 patients with previously untreated advanced clear cell RCC. Eligible participants needed a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either 3 mg of nivolumab plus 1 mg of ipilimumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by 3 mg of nivolumab every 2 weeks, or to receive oral sunitinib at 50 mg once daily for 6 cycles on a 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off schedule.2

      Patients received treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A 2017 amendment to the study design permitted patients receiving sunitinib to switch over to the nivolumab/ipilimumab cohort. The amendment also permitted discontinuation of any study treatment after 2 years.

      At the 5-year follow-up, patients who received nivolumab/ipilimumab demonstrated favorable overall survival (OS) rates compared with those who received sunitinib in both the intermediate-/poor-risk subgroup (HR, 0.68; P <.0001) and in the intent-to-treat (ITT) group (HR, 0.72; P <.0001).

      Also with the longer follow-up, the median duration of response was not reached (NR) among those receiving the combination compared with 19.7 months with sunitinib in the intermediate-/poor-risk subgroup (HR, 0.46; P < .0001) and NR and 24.8 months, respectively, in the ITT population (HR, 0.49; P < .0001).

      To assess HRQOL, patients were administered 3 different patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Kidney Symptom Index 19 (FACT-KSI19), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G), and the 3-level version of the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-3L).

      Assessment responses were collected at baseline, on day 1 of weeks 1 and 4 of the first 2 cycles, on day 1 of weeks 1 and 5 of the next 2 cycles, and on day 1 week 1 of all subsequent cycles.

      Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 treatment arms. Across all populations, PRO completion rates were high at baseline (>90%) and remained as such throughout treatment (>75%).

      FKSI-19 and FACT scores were initially comparable with the general US population at baseline, indicating that patients began treatment with relatively low symptom burden and good functioning scores. In comparison, although EQ-5D-3L indicated good health status, they were also lower than the general population they were compared against, which was the UK general population.

      Longitudinal Changes in PRO scores

      A mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was utilized to assess longitudinal changes in PRO scores spanning from baseline through week 235. Time was treated as a continuous variable.

      In both the ITT and intermediate-/poor-risk populations, nivolumab/ipilimumab elicited superior overall changes from baseline to 59 months.

      ITT Population

      For FKSI-19 total scores, nivolumab/ipilimumab induced a 0.45 LS mean (LSMean) change compared with –2.53 with sunitinib (LSMean change difference, 2.98; 95% CI, 2.04-3.92) in the ITT population.

      FKSI-19 Disease-Related Symptoms (DRS) scores showed a –0.17 and a –0.93 LSMean change with nivolumab/ipilimumab vs sunitinib, respectively (LSMean change difference, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.36-1.16). DRS-P LSMean changes were 0.13 vs –1.17 (LSMean change difference, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.73-1.87), and FWB changes were 0.01 vs –0.58 (LSMean change difference, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.29-0.88), respectively.

      FACT total score changes were 0.76 with nivolumab/ipilimumab vs –2.29 with sunitinib (LSMean change difference, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.55-4.55). Psychological well-being (PWB) changes were –0.73 vs –2.28, respectively (LSMean change difference, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.11-1.99) and FWB changes were 0.04 and –0.93, respectively (LSMean change difference, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.38-1.57).

      EQ-5D-3L VAS changes were 2.82 vs 0.39 with nivolumab/ipilimumab and sunitinib, respectively (LSMean change difference, 2.44; 95% CI, 0.42-4.46), and the UK Utility Index score changes were 0.01 vs –0.03 (LSMean change difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.03-0.06).

      Intermediate-/Poor-Risk Population

      In the intermediate-/poor-risk population, for FKSI-19 total scores, nivolumab/ipilimumab induced a 0.96 LSMean change compared with –2.43 with sunitinib (LSMean change difference, 3.39; 95% CI, 2.31-4.47). FKSI-19 DRS scores showed LSMean changes of –0.03 and–0.90 with nivolumab/ipilimumab and sunitinib, respectively (LSMean change difference, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.40-1.33). DRS-P LSMean changes were 0.40 vs –1.16, respectively (LSMean change difference, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.91-2.21), and FWB changes were 0.11 vs –0.58, respectively (LSMean change difference, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.35-1.03).

      FACT total score changes were 1.12 with nivolumab/ipilimumab vs –2.07 with sunitinib (LSMean change difference, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.45-4.92). PWB changes were –0.69 vs –2.39, respectively (LSMean change difference, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20-2.21) and FWB changes were 0.21 and –0.79, respectively (LSMean change difference, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.31-1.70).

      EQ-5D-3L VAS changes were 2.92 vs –0.38, respectively (LSMean change difference, 3.29; 95% CI, 0.96-5.63), and the UK Utility Index score changes were 0.01 vs –0.04 (LSMean change difference, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.03-0.07).

      Time to Event Analysis

      The study defined confirmed deterioration as a first clinically meaningful deterioration in PRO score that was confirmed by additional deterioration at the subsequent visit or dropout, resulting in missing data. A prespecified threshold considered to be clinically meaningful in previous literature was used to define clinically meaningful deterioration. A stratified log-rank test and Cox regression model were used to analyze time to confirmed deterioration.

      ITT Population

      A longer time to deterioration was observed across all FKSI-19 scores across both populations, including the total score, where the median time was 16.2 months vs 5.13 months in the nivolumab/ipilimumab vs sunitinib arms, respectively (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76; P <.0001), in the ITT population.

      Furthermore, time to confirmed deterioration in the DRS score was 17.74 months vs 7.95 months, in the nivolumab/ipilimumab vs sunitinib groups, respectively (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88; P = .0007). Median months for the DRS-P score were 23.36 months vs 7.33 months (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77; P <.0001), and functional well-being (FWB) was 15.70 months vs 8.61 months (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.92; P = .0040).

      Time to overall FACT-G confirmed deterioration in the ITT population was 23.10 months vs 10.02 months (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88; P = .0009). PWB deterioration was 15.80 months vs 3.98 months (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.67; P <.0001). FWB length was 13.57 months vs 8.61 months (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98; P = .0307).

      Time to confirmed EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) deterioration was 21.42 months vs 13.14 months (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.98; P = .0266). EQ-5D-3L UK utility index time to deterioration was 23.85 months vs 10.51 months (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.86; P = .0002).

      Intermediate-/Poor-Risk Population

      In the intermediate/poor risk population, the FKSI-19 total score time to deterioration was 17.87 months vs 5.26 in the nivolumab/ipilimumab group vs sunitinib group, respectively (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.75; P <.0001). DRS score was 19.88 months vs 7.33 months in the nivolumab/ipilimumab and sunitinib groups, respectively (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = .0010). The median DRS-P scores were 25.89 months vs 7.23 months (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.70; P <.0001), and functional well-being (FWB) was 19.06 months vs 10.58 months (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.93; P =.0071) for nivolumab/ipilimumab and sunitinib, respectively.

      The time to overall FACT-G confirmed deterioration in the intermediate-/poor-risk group was 24.38 months with nivolumab/ipilimumab vs 10.58 months with sunitinib (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89; P =.0021). PWB deterioration was 15.80 months vs 4.11 months (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.65; P <.0001). FWB length was 15.34 months vs 10.58 months (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.69-1.02; P = .0827).

      Time to confirmed EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) deterioration was 18.92 months vs 13.14 months with nivolumab/ipilimumab and sunitinib, respectively (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70-1.03; P =.0935). EQ-5D-3L UK utility index time to deterioration was 22.93 months vs 9.46 months (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.83; P = .0001).

      Bothersome AE Ratings

      Treatment-related adverse events (AE) impact was also analyzed. Researchers used generalized estimating equations models to descriptively assess pain impact with the following ratings:

      • Minimal bother (Not at all? Or a little bit?)
      • Notable bother (Somewhat? Quite a bit? Very much?)

      In all populations, the nivolumab/ipilimumab combination was associated with a decreased AE burden compared with sunitinib. Specifically, patients receiving the combo regimen in the ITT population were 76% less likely to experience a bothersome AE (odds ratio (OR), 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16-0.35) and those in the intermediate-/poor-risk population were 73% less likely (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18-0.40).

      “Treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was also associated with a decreased risk of being bothered by treatment side effects,” the study authors concluded. “These results suggest that the superior efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs sunitinib with extended follow-up continues to come with the additional benefit of improved long-term HRQOL and reduced disease-related symptoms in patients with [advanced] RCC.”

      References

      1. Cella D, Choueiri TK, Hamilton M, et al. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in previously untreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214: five-year follow-up results. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 6):307. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.307
      2. Albiges L, Tanniir NM, Burotto M, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 4-year follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial. ESMO Open. 2020;5(6):e001079. doi:10.1136/esmoopen-2020-001079

      Newsletter

      Stay up to date on recent advances in oncology nursing and patient care.

      Subscribe Now!
      Recent Videos
      Image of a man in a suit smiling in front of an Oncology Nursing News background
      Photo of a woman wearing a blazer in front of an Oncology Nursing News backdrop
      Photo of a white man with curly hair and in front of a blue Oncology Nursing News backdrop
      Image of a woman with gray hair and glasses in front of a blue Oncology Nursing News background
      Photo of a woman with blond wavy hair wearing a blazer in front of a blue Oncology Nursing News background
      Photo of a woman with shoulder-length blond hair in front of an Oncology Nursing News backdrop
      Image of a woman with white hair in front of an Oncology Nursing News blue background
      Image of a man in a suit standing in front of a blue Oncology Nursing News backdrop
      Man in suit standing in front of blue watercolor Oncology Nursing News backdrop
      Related Content

      Graphic of kidneys

      Allogenic CAR T-Cell Agent Safe, Active in Heavily Pretreated RCC

      Kyle Doherty
      July 1st 2025
      Article

      ALLO-316 showed significant activity and safety in patients with metastatic CD70-positive clear cell renal cell carcinoma.


      Lindsay Diamond Discusses Ongoing Role of Immunotherapy in Bladder Cancer

      Lindsay Diamond Discusses Ongoing Role of Immunotherapy in Bladder Cancer

      Lindsay Fischer
      April 3rd 2023
      Podcast

      Lindsay Diamond, MSN, AGNP-C, AOCNP, discusses findings from CheckMate 274 and other data presented during the 2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.


      Line illustration of the male genitourinary tract

      Ga-68 Kit Approved for Pre-Taxane RLT Selection in mCRPC

      Bridget Hoyt
      June 24th 2025
      Article

      Illuccix, a preparation kit for injectable Ga-68, has been approved to select patients for radioligand therapy before taxane chemotherapy.


      The Vitals

      Terri Pollack Offers Perspective on 2023 ASCO GI Cancers Symposium

      Lindsay Fischer
      March 1st 2023
      Podcast

      In this episode of "The Vitals," Terri Pollack, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, PMHNP-BC, underscores potentially practice-changing data which were presented during the 2023 GI Cancers Symposium.


      Graphic of a chain of DNA under a magnifying glass

      Genomic Changes May Drive Sotorasib KRAS G12C+ Combo Resistance in CRC

      Russ Conroy
      June 19th 2025
      Article

      Biomarker data from CodeBreaK 300 suggest DNA and RTK pathway alterations may underlie resistance to sotorasib plus panitumumab in CRC.


      Line illustration of a lung on a cornflower blue background

      Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Regimen Improves OS in Resectable NSCLC

      Kristi Rosa
      June 15th 2025
      Article

      Nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved OS vs chemo alone in resectable NSCLC, per updated CheckMate-816 findings.

      Related Content

      Graphic of kidneys

      Allogenic CAR T-Cell Agent Safe, Active in Heavily Pretreated RCC

      Kyle Doherty
      July 1st 2025
      Article

      ALLO-316 showed significant activity and safety in patients with metastatic CD70-positive clear cell renal cell carcinoma.


      Lindsay Diamond Discusses Ongoing Role of Immunotherapy in Bladder Cancer

      Lindsay Diamond Discusses Ongoing Role of Immunotherapy in Bladder Cancer

      Lindsay Fischer
      April 3rd 2023
      Podcast

      Lindsay Diamond, MSN, AGNP-C, AOCNP, discusses findings from CheckMate 274 and other data presented during the 2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.


      Line illustration of the male genitourinary tract

      Ga-68 Kit Approved for Pre-Taxane RLT Selection in mCRPC

      Bridget Hoyt
      June 24th 2025
      Article

      Illuccix, a preparation kit for injectable Ga-68, has been approved to select patients for radioligand therapy before taxane chemotherapy.


      The Vitals

      Terri Pollack Offers Perspective on 2023 ASCO GI Cancers Symposium

      Lindsay Fischer
      March 1st 2023
      Podcast

      In this episode of "The Vitals," Terri Pollack, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, PMHNP-BC, underscores potentially practice-changing data which were presented during the 2023 GI Cancers Symposium.


      Graphic of a chain of DNA under a magnifying glass

      Genomic Changes May Drive Sotorasib KRAS G12C+ Combo Resistance in CRC

      Russ Conroy
      June 19th 2025
      Article

      Biomarker data from CodeBreaK 300 suggest DNA and RTK pathway alterations may underlie resistance to sotorasib plus panitumumab in CRC.


      Line illustration of a lung on a cornflower blue background

      Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Regimen Improves OS in Resectable NSCLC

      Kristi Rosa
      June 15th 2025
      Article

      Nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved OS vs chemo alone in resectable NSCLC, per updated CheckMate-816 findings.

      Latest Conference Coverage

      Allogenic CAR T-Cell Agent Safe, Active in Heavily Pretreated RCC

      No Survival, Recurrence Benefit With Aspirin in CRC Liver Metastases

      Relacorilant Combo Sustains Ovarian Cancer Benefit Post Platinum Break

      Genomic Changes May Drive Sotorasib KRAS G12C+ Combo Resistance in CRC

      View More Latest Conference Coverage
      About Us
      Editorial Board
      Contact Us
      CancerNetwork.com
      CureToday.com
      OncLive.com
      TargetedOnc.com
      Advertise
      Privacy
      Terms & Conditions
      Do Not Sell My Information
      Contact Info

      2 Commerce Drive
      Cranbury, NJ 08512

      609-716-7777

      © 2025 MJH Life Sciences

      All rights reserved.