Adagrasib shows early signs of activity and tolerability in patients with STK11/KRAS G12C–mutated non–small cell lung cancer.
ORR appeared to be higher in patients without KEAP1 comutations vs those with KEAP1 mutations.
In a phase 2 cohort of the KRYSTAL-1 trial (NCT03785249), first-line adagrasib (Krazati) produced a clinically meaningful objective response rate (ORR) of 30.3% (95% CI, 15.6%–48.7%) and a disease control rate of 66.7% in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring both KRAS G12C and STK11 mutations, according to data presented at the 2025 AACR Annual Meeting.1
The ORR appeared numerically higher in patients without KEAP1 comutations (38%) compared with those with KEAP1 mutations (24%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.6-13.9), and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months (95% CI, 4.9-19.1).
Consistent with prior reports, adagrasib was well tolerated in this first-line setting. These data suggest that adagrasib monotherapy may represent a viable first-line treatment option for this specific patient subgroup, particularly in the absence of KEAP1 comutations, especially for those who may not be ideal candidates for standard first-line regimens.
STK11 mutations are frequently observed in KRAS-mutated NSCLC and are associated with an immunosuppressive phenotype and poorer outcomes with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. KEAP1 comutations, which often coexist with STK11 mutations, further worsen the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents and have also been shown to reduce the effectiveness of the KRAS G12C inhibitor adagrasib in the second-line setting. However, the impact of KRAS G12C/STK11 comutations, with or without concurrent KEAP1 alterations, on the efficacy of adagrasib as first-line treatment was previously unknown.
To address this, a phase 2 cohort (E) of the KRYSTAL-1 study evaluated first-line adagrasib (600 mg orally twice daily) in patients with advanced KRAS G12C/STK11-mutated NSCLC. KRAS G12C and STK11 mutations were identified using local or central sponsor-approved tests on tumor tissue or circulating tumor DNA.
The FDA previously granted accelerated approval to adagrasib/cetuximab (Erbitux) in June 2024 for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who were previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy.2
KRYSTAL-1 is an open-label, nonrandomized, multiple-expansion cohort phase 1/2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of adagrasib and cetuximab in patients with advanced KRAS G12C-mutated solid tumors.3 Enrollment in the study was open to patients with no available treatment options with curative intent or refusing or being ineligible for standard-of-care treatment in phase 1 and 2. Patients must have been receiving previous treatment with fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and a VEGF/VEGFR inhibitor in phase 2, and are required to have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
For phase 2 of the study, ORR by blinded independent central review per RECIST 1.1 criteria served as the primary end point. Secondary end points included PFS, duration of response (DOR), OS, and safety.3
As of the data cutoff (April 30, 2024), 35 patients with KRAS G12C and STK11 mutations were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, 66% were female, and the majority had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
Among 33 evaluable patients, the ORR was 30.3% (95% CI, 15.6-48.7), with a disease control rate of 67%. The ORR was numerically higher in the KEAP1 mutation group vs in the KEAP1 wild-type group (38% vs 24%, respectively). The median DOR was not reached at a median follow-up of 7.8 months.
With a median follow-up of 7.8 months, median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.6-13.9) and median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI, 4.9-19.1). Median PFS was shorter in patients with concurrent KEAP1 mutations (5.5 months) compared with those without (8.4 months; 95% CI, 1.4-not evaluable [NE]). Among 7 patients with PD-L1 expression greater than or equal to 50%, the median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 1.3-NE).
Looking at safety, the safety profile of adagrasib among all 35 patients was shown to be consistent with prior studies, with treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) leading to treatment discontinuation in 2 patients (5.7%) and dose modification in 18 patients (51.4%). Any-grade TRAEs were seen in 34 patients (97%), with the most common being nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting.
Twelve patients (34%) had grade 3 TRAEs, with the most common being diarrhea and fatigue. Grade 4 TRAEs occurred in 3 patients (9%) and included cerebrovascular accident (n = 1), renal failure (n = 1), and seizure and mental status changes (n =1). Further, there were no grade 5 TRAEs.
Overall, data from this phase 2 cohort of the KRYSTAL-1 study showed adagrasib to be well tolerated, leading to promising efficacy findings when used as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring KRAS G12C and STK11 mutations.
The role of first-line adagrasib in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC is being further investigated in combination with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in the KRYSTAL-7 study (NCT04613596) and with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in KRYSTAL-17 (NCT05609578).1