Oncology nurses can play a key role in educating patients and supporting clinical trial participation for this new treatment option.
Rashes are the most common dermatologic AE associated with anti-EGFR therapies.
Taking care of patients receiving anti-EGFR therapy, such as cetuximab or panitumumab, often involves managing dermatologic toxicities, most commonly an acneiform rash.1 This distinctive rash typically appears on the face, scalp, or upper torso and can be both physically uncomfortable and emotionally distressing for patients. While topical therapies and oral antibiotics are often prescribed for management, some patients have rash that is refractory to these interventions.
If not well controlled, the rash can lead to dose reductions or discontinuation of anti-EGFR therapy, compromising treatment efficacy. Oncology nurses are frequently on the front lines of identifying and addressing this adverse event (AE).
In a recent abstract presented at the 2025 American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting, Anisha B. Patel, MD, an associate professor of dermatology and chief of the section of cutaneous toxicities at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, shared findings from a study that explored whether applying a topical BRAF inhibitor, LUT014 gel, could counteract EGFR inhibition in the skin and help resolve rash without compromising cancer therapy.2
In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 117 patients with grade 2 or non-infected grade 3 acneiform rash were enrolled across 23 sites and randomized to apply either LUT014 gel (at 0.03% or 0.1% concentrations) or placebo to affected areas daily for 28 days. The goal was to improve rash severity or skin-related quality of life, measured by either a reduction in CTCAE grade or a ≥5-point improvement on a skin-specific quality of life questionnaire (FACT-EGFRI-18).
The results were promising. In the intention-to-treat population, 74% of patients using the 0.1% gel (P = .0001) and 56% of those using the 0.03% gel (P = .021) met the treatment success criteria, compared to only 28% in the placebo group. Among patients who were evaluable (those who used the treatment and did not discontinue due to unrelated reasons), success rates were even higher: 85% for the 0.1% group (P = .0001) and 69% for the 0.03% group (P = .009), versus 32% for placebo. These differences were statistically significant.
Importantly, the gel was well tolerated. Most AEs were mild (grade 1 or 2), and no grade 4 or 5 events were reported. The 0.1% gel group had only one grade 3 event, and the 0.03% group had none.
This study is the first placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to demonstrate that a topical agent can significantly and safely improve anti-EGFR-related rash, according to the abstract.
For oncology nurses, this study presents a potential new tool in managing skin toxicities, allowing patients to hopefully continue life-prolonging anti-EGFR therapy without interruption due to dermatologic AEs. While the development of this drug is still in its early phases, nurses can encourage eligible patients to participate in clinical trials to access this therapy.
Oncology nurses also play a key role in educating patients about how this treatment works. They can explain that anti-EGFR therapies cause a rash by blocking the MAPK pathway in the skin, which is essential for skin health. While BRAF inhibitors are typically used to block this pathway in cancer cells with a specific mutation (BRAF V600E), they actually reactivate the pathway in normal skin cells. By applying a BRAF inhibitor gel LUT014 directly to the rash, this treatment aims to restore the skin’s healing process without interfering with the cancer treatment, improving the rash while allowing patients to continue their effective therapy.
Multidisciplinary Training of BiTE-Associated AEs Increases Safety in Outpatient Setting
April 13th 2025Authors noted that BiTEs have expanded the treatment paradigms for several types of solid tumors and blood cancers; however, toxicities associated with this class of agents have raised safety concerns.