Michael A. Postow, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, an expert in immunotherapies for melanoma, offers practical advice for administering immune checkpoint inhibitors to patients.
Michael A. Postow, MD
As immunotherapy agents enter into greater clinical use in oncology, clinicians are learning to manage immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) related to the mechanism of action of these new drugs.
In this article, Michael A. Postow, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, an expert in immunotherapies for melanoma, offers practi­cal advice for administer­ing immune checkpoint inhibitors to patients.
FDA-approved drugs in this category are ipilimumab, which targets CTLA-4, and nivolumab and pembrolizumab, which inhibit PD-1. All three agents are approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma; nivolumab also is indicated in metastatic non—small cell lung cancer while pembrolizumab is under review in that malignancy
Q: What are the most important IRAEs associated with these therapies?
For ipilimumab and for PD-1 inhibitors as well, the most common side effect is dermatologic toxicity. Typically, the rashes that people will have are erythematous, a red rash occurring on the trunk, arms, or lower extremities.
With ipilimumab alone, the dermatologic toxicity onset is typically within the first month, even after the first dose of treatment. Rash or dermatologic toxicity, however, can happen at any time after the first dose, and, at least with ipilimumab, I have seen them occur after all four doses have been given, even when the patient has tolerated the initial treatment course well.
Q: What are the less commonly observed adverse events with these agents?
For ipilimumab in particular, a less common side effect is an enterocolitis/colitis-like event, which typically manifests as diarrhea. Although less common than skin rash, this is a more dangerous event that clinicians need to understand. This is more common with the ipilimumab-type drugs than with the PD-1 drugs, but it can occur with both. If it occurs, the diarrhea or enterocolitis will typically set in after the second or third dose.
Although less frequent than colitis and diarrhea, endocrinopathies may also occur, as well as hepatitis or inflammation of the liver. The frequency of these events depends how one defines the endocrinopathies and hepatitis and their severity, but generally these would rank as number three and four after dermatologic events and diarrhea. One type of endocrinopathy that often can be hard to diagnose is hypophysitis, which is inflammation of the pituitary gland; this may present as headaches, fatigue, and other nonspecific symptoms.
Q: What are the general strategies for managing these events?
Rash is typically managed first with topical corticosteroids, such as triamcinolone cream, hydrocortisone cream, or another low-potency corticosteroid. If that is insufficient, some people require oral steroids for very severe rashes, or [rashes] that affect so much of the body surface area that the cream cannot be applied successfully. Some patients will just have a lacy, faint, erythematous rash that doesn’t bother them, and some patients will just be itchy without a rash, which can also be problematic, since people can be very bothered by itching. The maximal treatment one would ever consider for a rash, if it were terrible—which is, fortunately, very rare —[is when] people would come into the hospital for fluids, electrolyte management, and IV steroids. In most cases, though, the rashes can be managed and the drug can be continued.
Diarrhea can happen with or without colitis in about a third of patients, and can be significant in about 10% of patients. In terms of treatment, first you would ensure that you have excluded other etiologies, for example, Clostridium difficile or other infectious types of diarrhea. Typical treatment, when you have substantial diarrhea, is oral corticosteroids, so prednisone, orally. The ipilimumab package insert has algorithms with number of stools per day and so on to recommend discontinuing treatment, but in the broad context, if patients are on steroids for anything more than a mild situation, they generally don’t resume ipilimumab. Imodium, other types of antidiarrheals, and a bland diet can also help if the symptoms are mild.
Drawing a thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level and a liver function test (LFT) is required before starting, and with each dose of ipilimumab endocrinopathies or hepatitis can be detected [often] in this way. Patients with events such as LFT abnormalities will often not be symptomatic, and these can usually be corrected with oral steroids. Endocrinopathies can be more difficult to correct. When an endocrinopathy ensues, it’s typically a permanent problem, which means patients will need to take hormone supplements long term, usually for life.
Q: Have any notable differences in IRAEs emerged for the anti-CTLA-4 versus the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents?
In my experience, the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents have been less likely to cause significant side effects than anti-CTLA-4 agents like ipilimumab. There are a lot of theories as to why that might be the case; some think it may be due to the fact that [anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents] are acting at the point where the tumor cells are interacting with the T cells, which keeps some of the activation of the immune system localized in the tumor itself, as opposed to more nonspecifically and systemically throughout the body. Others think that agents like ipilimumab work in part by depleting regulatory T cells throughout the body, which may also account for the more systemic immune stimulation with ipilimumab versus the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents.
Q: Are there any rare/serious AEs associated with these therapies about which clinicians should be especially vigilant?
Pneumonitis, or lung inflammation, with the anti- PD-1 agents, is very important because it did, unfortunately, result in some treatment-related deaths. This is particularly important now that anti-PD-1 agents like nivolumab are expanding into indications like lung cancer. Patients may experience, for example, fever or shortness of breath that can be attributable to many other causes within this disease state. Pneumonitis may be treated with steroid immunosuppression or IV steroids as needed, and some patients may require bronchoscopy to exclude infection as part of the differential diagnosis. Other rare neurologic conditions may also occur; we have had patients with aseptic meningitis, sensory and motor neuropathies, and even Guillain—Barré syndrome, and I mention these [because] they can be life-threatening if not recognized and treated appropriately.
In addition, patients who have IRAEs requiring steroids or other immunosuppressive agents like infliximab for diarrhea, or sometimes mycophenolate for transaminitis that is not responsive to steroids, have, in some anecdotal cases, acquired opportunistic infections as a result of their subsequent immunosuppression.
We had, for example, a patient with Aspergillus infection that we recently reported in the literature. I would stress that, so far, these have been only isolated cases, and it’s not clear whether this type of event may become an epiphenomenon with increasing use of these agents, but it’s certainly another possible event to be aware of.
Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Improves pCR Across ER+ Breast Cancer Subgroups
Tucatinib Continues to Show Benefit in Pretreated HER2+ Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases
Ribociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy Continues to Perform Well Across MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 Trials
Patient-Reported Outcomes From CAPItello-291 Trial Support Capivasertib/Fulvestrant in HR+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer