Nurses must stay up to date on novel agents and their toxicities to properly monitor for and manage immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.
When monitoring for immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), stemming from treatment with CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies for patients with hematologic cancers, it is imperative to stay up to date on these novel agents and their associated toxicity profiles to properly manage adverse effects (AEs).
“Awareness of the symptoms and AEs associated with these treatments, and competence in selecting the appropriate pharmacologic management, is essential for the resolution and optimal recovery of patients,” Beth Faiman, PhD, MSN, APN-BC, BMTCN, AOCN, FAAN, FAPO, a nurse practitioner at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute in Ohio, said in a presentation during the 9th Annual School of Nursing Oncology, an event hosted by Physicians’ Education Resource®, LLC.1
ICANS stems from neurologic toxicities that can occur anywhere from days to weeks following these therapies, and can include the following signs or symptoms:
“I see a lot more of a mild headache than I see fulminant-like confusion or [patients who] can't write [their] name,” Faiman added.
If ICANS is suspected, patients undergo neuroimaging, generally via MRI, and a diagnostic lumbar puncture for opening pressure and infection tests. For grades 2 and higher, patients are often treated with corticosteroids.
Faiman walked through an example of an immune effector cell-associated encephalopathy (ICE) screening tool, which assesses whether or not treatment has led to encephalopathy. Patients are asked about the following, and scored accordingly:
Depending on the assessment, the score is as follows:
Neurotoxicity, of which the exact mechanism is unknown, can occur in the absence of, concurrently with, or after CRS, which is the most common AE of immune cell effector therapies and is considered to be a distinct process from ICANS. Neurotoxicity onset can be acute, such as palsy, or chronic or delayed in onset, such as lack of focus or “chemo brain.” Faiman noted the toxicities tend to be self-limited and reversible.
Other considerations when patients are undergoing CAR T-cell therapy and bispecifics comprise monitoring for prolonged cytopenias, B-cell aplasia, infection, late neurotoxicity, relapse, and secondary malignancies.
Institutional guidelines should be in place for management of more long-term toxicities, such as B-cell aplasia/hypogammaglobulinemia, cytopenias, and infections.
“You can see some B-cell aplasia. If [a patient with hematologic cancers has] been heavily pretreated, [they] can get more cytopenias, [they] can have immune infection resilience—so they get hypogammaglobulinemia and increased atypical infections,” Faiman explained. “You want to monitor for that, but that tends to resolve with CAR T-cell therapies.”
For B-cell aplasia/hypogammaglobulinemia, patients should have monitoring of their immunoglobulin (IgG) levels post treatment, and, similarly, blood counts should be monitored after therapy for cytopenias. Grade 3 or higher cytopenias that are unresolved by day 30 after treatment occur in a significant proportion of patients. Infections, Faiman noted, need to be managed in accordance with institutional policies and in consultation with infectious disease specialists.
“[For B-cell aplasia], we tend to recommend—and this is based on the transplant cellular therapy infection guidelines as well as NCCN—to give [intravenous] IgG right before they go to CAR T-cell therapy, and then monthly until their IgG levels are over 600 [μg/L] consistently,” Faiman said.
Antimicrobial prophylaxis may vary across institutions, but at the core, Faiman recommended continuation for at least 6 months, depending on a patient’s prior history of shingles. CD4 counts should also be measured at 6 months and discontinued only when the CD4 count is above 200.
All patients should have annual influenza vaccines, posttransplant vaccines to resume 12 months after therapy, and COVID-19 vaccinations 3 months from CAR T-cell therapy.
Overall, Faiman noted that the key concepts for AE prevention for those on bispecific antibodies are premedication, step-up dosing, subcutaneous dosing, growth factor support, and antimicrobial prophylaxis.
However, because talquetamab (Talvey), is a GPRC5D- and CD3-targeting bispecific antibody, Faiman explained that it has its own unique set of toxicities and dermatologic AE management:
Grade 3 rash should be treated with methylprednisolone taper and betamethasone 0.05% cream, and dose holds should be considered for other grade 3 dermatologic AEs. Dermatology consults may be helpful as an early strategy, she added.
Oral talquetamab-related toxicities and their mitigation strategies include:
Overall, education and emotional support are key strategies for managing oral toxicities, she said.
Editor’s Note: This is part 3 of a multi-part series of Beth Faiman’s presentation at the 9th Annual School of Nursing Oncology.
Faiman B. Updates in novel therapies across hematologic malignancies. Presented at: 9th Annual School of Nursing Oncology; August 9, 2025; Nashville, TN.