Trastuzumab Biosimilar CT-P6 Shows Comparable Efficacy at 2-Year Follow-up
CT-P6, a proposed biosimilar to trastuzumab, exhibited long-term disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) similar to the reference product in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.
CT-P6, a proposed biosimilar to trastuzumab (Herceptin), exhibited long-term disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) similar to the reference product in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. Two-year results from a phase III comparison confirmed the similar efficacy and safety that was apparent at 1 year.
The 2-year data “add to the totality of the evidence considered by the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA],” said Francisco J. Esteva, MD, PhD, who presented the results at the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
“The findings are reassuring after 2 years that they’re still getting similar results, which is important,” added Esteva, director of Breast Medical Oncology, New York University Langone Health.
The double-blind, randomized, multicenter phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant trastuzumab and CT-P6 in 549 patients with HER2-positive stage I to IIIa operable breast cancer.1 Patients were randomized to anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab versus chemotherapy in combination with CT-P6. After surgery, patients continued to receive trastuzumab or CT-P6 to complete 1 year of therapy.
A total of 528 patients (259 in the CT-P6 arm and 269 in the reference trastuzumab arm) initiated the follow-up period, with a median follow-up duration of 27 months at the data cutoff of November 30, 2017.
In the intention-to-treat (ITT) set, the proportion with 2-year DFS was 86% (95% CI, 80%-90%) in the CT-P6 arm and 90% (95% CI, 85%-93%) in the reference trastuzumab arm.1 In the per-protocol set, these percentages and confidence intervals were identical.
Median DFS and OS had not been reached. Two-year OS was 97% (95% CI, 93%-98%) in the CT-P6 arm and 98% (95% CI, 96%-99%) in the reference trastuzumab arm in the ITT analysis, and 97% (95% CI 94%-99%) and 98% (95% CI 96%-99%) in the per-protocol set.
Three-year OS data were also presented and remained similar in the ITT analysis (92% [95% CI, 86%-96%] for CT-P6 vs 93% [95% CI, 87%-96%] for reference trastuzumab) as well as the per-protocol set (94% [95% CI, 88%-97%] for CT-P6 vs 93% [95% CI, 86%-96%] for reference trastuzumab).
The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was maintained at >55% during the 1 year on treatment and the follow-up period. The median post-baseline worst LVEF value was 60 (95% CI, 38-70) in the CT-P6 arm and 60 (95% CI, 30-76) in the reference product arm. Some 29.5% in the CT-P6 arm and 25.2% in the reference product arm had a decrease in LVEF of ≥10 points, and 3.3% and 2.5%, respectively, had an LVEF <50 and a decrease of ≥10 points.
The rate of cardiac adverse events during the 1 year of treatment and follow-up was 11.8% and 13.7% in the CT-P6 and reference trastuzumab arms, respectively. The rates of cardiac disorders related to study drug were 8.1% and 8.6%, respectively, with most being grade 1 disorders. The rates of unrelated cardiac disorders were 5.2% in the CT-P6 group and 6.8% in the reference trastuzumab group.
During the follow-up period, 1.1% in the CT-P6 arm and 0.7% in the reference product arm had a new cardiac adverse event, most often palpitations (3.7% vs 2.9%).
The median age of patients in the study was 53 years in both arms and approximately 90% in both arms had an ECOG performance status of 0. The primary endpoint of the study was pathologic complete response (pCR), which was similar between CT-P6 and reference trastuzumab (46.8% vs 50.4%, respectively), as the 95% CI of the difference in the estimated treatment outcome was within the predefined equivalence margin (risk ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78-1.11).2
In addition, breast pCR was similar between CT-P6 and reference trastuzumab (51.6% vs 55.1%, respectively) and for pCR without ductal carcinoma in situ (39.9% vs 41.4%).
References
- Esteva FJ, Lee S, Yu S, et al. 24 months results from a double-blind, randomized phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant then adjuvant trastuzumab and its biosimilar candidate CT-P6 in HER2 positive early breast cancer (EBC). Presented at: 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 5-8; San Antonio, Tx. Abstract P6-17-03.
- Stebbing J, Baranau Y, Baryash V, et al. CT-P6 compared with reference trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 equivalence trial. Lancet Oncology. 2017;18:917-928.
This article originally appeared on OncLive® as “Trastuzumab Biosimilar CT-P6 Shows Comparable Efficacy at 2-Year Follow-up.”
Olaparib Plus Chemo May Not Improve Outcomes vs Chemo Alone in BRCA Wild-Type TNBC
April 23rd 2024Patients with BRCA wild-type triple-negative breast cancer treated with olaparib on a gap schedule with chemotherapy did not experience improved responses compared with chemotherapy alone in the neoadjuvant setting.
Nurse Practitioners Weigh in on Data From the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
January 16th 2023Loyda Braithwaite, MSN, RN, AGPCNP-BC, AOCNP; and Jamie Carroll, APRN, CNP, MSN, highlight presentations from the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium that will influence oncology nursing practice.
FDA Grants Accelerated Approval to Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-Nxki in HER2+ Solid Tumors
April 5th 2024The FDA granted accelerated approval to fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (Enhertu) for patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive solid tumors who have received prior systemic treatment.
